Common measures of reliability include internal consistency, test-retest, and inter-rater reliabilities. Reliability refers to the degree to which an instrument yields consistent results. Often times, when developing, modifying, and interpreting the validity of a given instrument, rather than view or test each type of validity individually, researchers and evaluators test for evidence of several different forms of validity, collectively (e.g., see Samuel Messick’s work regarding validity). A common measurement of this type of validity is the correlation coefficient between two measures. Criterion-related validity indicates the extent to which the instrument’s scores correlate with an external criterion (i.e., usually another measurement from a different instrument) either at present ( concurrent validity) or in the future ( predictive validity).Common methods to assess construct validity include, but are not limited to, factor analysis, correlation tests, and item response theory models (including Rasch model). Construct validity indicates the extent to which a measurement method accurately represents a construct (e.g., a latent variable or phenomena that can’t be measured directly, such as a person’s attitude or belief) and produces an observation, distinct from that which is produced by a measure of another construct.Subject matter expert review is often a good first step in instrument development to assess content validity, in relation to the area or field you are studying. Content validity indicates the extent to which items adequately measure or represent the content of the property or trait that the researcher wishes to measure.Three common types of validity for researchers and evaluators to consider are content, construct, and criterion validities. Validity refers to the degree to which an instrument accurately measures what it intends to measure. Attention to these considerations helps to insure the quality of your measurement and of the data collected for your study. Validity and reliability are two important factors to consider when developing and testing any instrument (e.g., content assessment test, questionnaire) for use in a study. Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.How to Determine the Validity and Reliability of an Instrument The reliability value of this book (R) is 0.75, so it has fulfilled the reliability requirement. Meanwhile, based on the Grinnell's reliability instrument, a module book is considered to be reliable if the reliability value (R) is higher than 0.75. Therefore, the module book has fulfilled the validity criterion. Based on the determined criterion, instrument validity should be higher than 3.00. The results showed that the mean value obtained from the three experts in terms of the aspects of content, language and evaluation is 2.25, 3.44 and 3.58, respectively, and the overall mean value is 3.46. Two instruments were employed to test the validity and reliability of the module book. This research was conducted in State Junior High School 2 (SMPN 2) Banyumas using descriptive quantitative approach. The objective of this present research was to test the validity and reliability of a scientific-based module book according to the 2013 curriculum.